Huffman v. C. C. Oliphant & Son, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an employer or insurer’s good faith belief that an employee is not entitled to compensation is irrelevant under the applicable statute because only the Board can make such a determination and payment should continue until any such determination is made
• “Because no ‘amount due’ was ever established for Plaintiffs lost wages, medical expenses, and mileage reimbursement Huffman claims, Home Depot is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).