Huff v. Swartz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that at-will employee could be liable for tortious interference against co-employee when employee acted for his own personal benefit and not for benefit of employer
• concluding that factors recited by Restatement for determining whether interference is “improper” should be used to determine whether interference is “unjustified” under Nebraska law
• holding that an employee could be found to have tortiously interfered with the contract of another employee if he acted for his personal benefit and not the benefit of the employer
• listing factors to consider in determining whether interference with a business relationship is unjustified
• listing factors to consider in determining whether interference with a business relationship is unjustified
• listing elements of tortious interference with a business relationship or expectation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).