Huff v. Great Western Seed Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “plaintiff’s belated discovery of an employer’s unlawful motive does not delay the commencement of the statutory limitations period”
• noting that dictionary definitions of the word “occurrence” failed to confirm whether the legislature intended ORS 659.121(3) to include a discovery rule
• notwithstanding earlier cases, courts cannot apply a “discovery rule” to a statute of limitations if the text of the statute does not so provide
• ORS 659.121(3) requiring action to “be commenced within one year of the occurrence of the alleged unlawful employment practice” does not incorporate a discovery rule
• plaintiff’s belated discovery of employer’s unlawful motive does not delay commencement of statutory limitations period in case brought under ORS 659.121(1)
• plaintiff's belated discovery of employer's unlawful motive does not delay commencement of statutory limitations period in case brought under ORS 659.121(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).