Huff v. Conley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “Jones Act claims are not subject to removal, even if the parties are diverse.”
• “The House Report on the 2011 amendments evidences no intent to change the operation of removal of maritime or admiralty cases.”
• “The House Report on the 2011 amendments evidences no intent to change the operation of removal of maritime or admiralty cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).