Skip to main content
· 2/11/2000

Huff Contracting v. Sark

Citations

  • 12 S.W.3d 704
  • 2000 Ky. App. LEXIS 13
  • 2000 WL 199337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in-volving settlement of claim to future medical benefits under workers’ compensation law
  • “[T]he term “consideration” is ... defined [as] ‘[a] benefit to the party promising, or a loss or detriment to the party to whom the promise is made.’ ”
  • “[T]he term “consideration” is . . . defined [as] ‘[a] benefit to the party promising, or a loss or detriment to the party to whom the promise is made.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barber, Huddleston, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.