Skip to main content

Huey v. State

Citations

  • 722 So. 2d 286
  • 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16472
  • 1998 WL 906942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is no double jeopardy violation when a defendant is convicted of the crime of delivery of a- controlled substance and possession with intent to sell the same substance, because each crime contains an element that the other does not”
  • “There is no double jeopardy violation when a defendant is convicted of the crime of delivery of a controlled substance and possession with intent to sell the same substance, because each crime contains an element that the other does not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Antoon, Griffin, Orfinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.