· 10/21/1986
Huesers v. King
Citations
- 45 Wash. App. 1036
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- excluding an expert’s testimony because he did not “demonstrate that he fol lowed a scientific method embraced by at least some other experts in the field”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.