Skip to main content
· 2/21/2012

Huertas v. Astrue

Citations

  • 844 F. Supp. 2d 197
  • 2012 WL 592743
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \statistical and anecdotal evidence must be considered in tandem\
  • finding ascertainable a class of technical workers where the plaintiffs’ expert provided a list of job titles for inclusion in the class
  • approving the plaintiffs’ expert’s list of job titles for inclusion of the class where the list was constructed based upon the expert’s judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neiman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.