Hudson's Guardian v. Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the “ingredient defense” and finding a reasonable consumer would not be deceived by an ambiguity in a product’s label if that product had a disclosed ingredient list that clarified the ambiguity
• “Plaintiff need only allege that the actual value of the product as purchased was less than the value of the product as represented to state a claim for an ascertainable loss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).