Hudson v. Wisconsin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Fourth and Fifth Amendment claims against border patrol agent for cross-border shooting implicated new Bivens contexts, and special factors prohibited recognition of the claims
• noting that “no federal circuit has extended the holding of Boumediene [v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008)] . . . to other constitutional provisions
• explaining threat of criminal prosecution is not hollow

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).