· 1/22/2009
Hudson v. WILLIAMS, BLACKBURN & MAHARRY, PLC
Citations
- 763 N.W.2d 276
- 2009 Iowa App. LEXIS 378
- 2009 WL 139501
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The bare conclusory statements contained in Hudson's resistance and statement of disputed facts are not sufficient to defeat the motion for summary judgment.\
- “The bare conclusory statements contained in Hudson’s resistance and statement of disputed facts are not sufficient to defeat the motion 9 for summary judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.