Skip to main content
· 2/26/1992

Hudson v. Twenty-Three East Adams Street Corp.

Citations

  • 787 F. Supp. 141
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2245
  • 1992 WL 55374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “This lack of evidence positively connecting the defendants to the plaintiffs injury would render any verdict for the plaintiff a product of mere speculation, or a conclusion deduced by surmise and guess work.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parsons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.