Skip to main content

Hudson v. State

Citations

  • 745 So. 2d 997
  • 1999 WL 770614

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that in Florida the focus is generally on whether a defendant’s actions are preparatory or overt and that the determination is usually case specific
  • affirming the conviction of a defendant who attempted child enticement by writing letters to a \child\ who was actually an adult law enforcement officer
  • “[T]he line between preparatory acts and overt acts is difficult to draw and tends to be case specific,”
  • \[T]he line between preparatory acts and overt acts is difficult to draw and tends to be case specific.\
  • “The substantial step ap- proach is authorized by the Model Penal Code. That model act has not been adopted in Florida, and it is doubtful we could utilize that approach in the absence of the model act’s statutory language.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altenbernd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.