Skip to main content
· 4/28/1965

Hudson v. Reserve Life Insurance

Citations

  • 141 S.E.2d 926
  • 245 S.C. 615
  • 1965 S.C. LEXIS 305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where accident and health policy showed parties contemplated continuous insurance rather than successive independent contracts, newly enacted statute held inapplicable to previously issued policy though renewal premiums were paid and accepted after effective date
  • policy showed the parties contemplated continuous agreement rather than successive independent contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brailsford, Taylor, Moss, Lewis, Bussey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.