· 4/28/1965
Hudson v. Reserve Life Insurance
Citations
- 141 S.E.2d 926
- 245 S.C. 615
- 1965 S.C. LEXIS 305
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where accident and health policy showed parties contemplated continuous insurance rather than successive independent contracts, newly enacted statute held inapplicable to previously issued policy though renewal premiums were paid and accepted after effective date
- policy showed the parties contemplated continuous agreement rather than successive independent contracts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brailsford, Taylor, Moss, Lewis, Bussey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.