Hudson v. Outram

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a lack of substantial evidence where reviewing physicians did not opine on whether the plaintiff was capable of working
• finding Brenman’s opinions “seriously flawed” as 6 result of his inconsistent demands for corroboration of pain
• finding Brenman’s opinions “seriously flawed” as 6 result of his inconsistent demands for corroboration of pain
• declining to award special weight to the plaintiff’s treating physician where that physician’s assessment “was based on the plaintiff’s subjective reports rather than her own observations or other objective criteria”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).