Hudson v. Norris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no valid retaliation claim against defendant against whom plaintiff had made no specific allegations or presented any evidence
• inference reasonable in part because evidence that the reasons given for certain adverse employment actions were false
• large number of adverse actions within four months of protected activity, plus evidence of pretext, established causation
• a “large number of adverse actions” occurring “hard on the heels of the protected activity”—i.e., over the course of four months—created a strong inference of causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).