Skip to main content

Hudson v. McClaskey

Citations

  • 641 N.E.2d 36
  • 1994 WL 549579

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the effect of McClaskey's failure to file any answer to Hudson's counterclaim was that the aver-ments of the counterclaim were deemed admitted according to T.R.8(D)
  • where grantee deprived of use of any part of tract, damages equal value that specific part contributed to value of whole tract
  • the trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting expert testimony of land value by an auctioneer/broker/appraiser who allegedly lacked formal appraisal training but had taken several appraisal courses
  • proportional value, not just quantity of land, should be measure of damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Rucker, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.