Skip to main content
· 9/28/2000

Hudson v. General Dynamics Corp.

Citations

  • 118 F. Supp. 2d 226
  • 26 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1432
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “As the Supreme Court noted in Varity, such conduct can create liability even among strangers,” and “ERISA requires more of a fiduciary in discharging such duties than that he or she simply refrain from outright lying.”
  • similarly holding that Ballone rejected the Fischer ‘serious consideration’ test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arterton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.