Hudson Trading Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the ALJ is entitled to draw 28 inferences ‘logically flowing from the evidence’”
• holding that the ALJ is permitted to make logical 26 inferences
• noting that a claimant’s attempts at seeking work may be considered when evaluating symptom testimony
• finding that an ALJ did 23 1 not err in relying on a claimant’s unsuccessful attempts to find work as one reason to discount 2 his allegation of disability
• “The opinion of a 11 psychiatrist who examines the claimant after the expiration of his disability 12 insured status, however, is entitled to less weight than the opinion of a psychiatrist 13 who completed a contemporaneous exam.”
• reports “issued after the Commissioner’s 13 decision … are less persuasive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).