Skip to main content
· 3/5/1996

Hudson Riverkeeper Fund, Inc. v. Harbor at Hastings Associates

Citations

  • 917 F. Supp. 251
  • 26 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21120
  • 44 ERC (BNA) 1465
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2652
  • 1996 WL 101577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[i]t would seem unlikely that Building 15 would fit into this interpretation of point source as any discharge of material would not be deliberate or systematic\
  • \[i]t would seem unlikely that Building 15 would fit into this interpretation of point source as any discharge of material would not be deliberate or systematic\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brieant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.