Skip to main content
· 7/2/1998

Hudkins v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 39 F. Supp. 2d 1349
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22103
  • 1998 WL 1021804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the primary duty of a recruiter at company that placed nurses in hospitals “was directly related to the Defendant’s general business operation”
  • holding the administrative exemption applied to an employee who recruited and placed nurses, but without analyzing discretion and independent judgment
  • holding the administrative exemption applied to an employee who recruited and placed nurses, but -without analyzing discretion and independent judgment
  • finding that in the context of a nurse-staffing agency, the nurses a recruiter placed with the clients produced the services offered by the business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazzara

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.