Skip to main content

Hudgins v. State

Citations

  • 451 N.E.2d 1087
  • 1983 Ind. LEXIS 913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any misstatements of law during closing argument are presumed cured by final instruction
  • holding that “[a]ny misstatements of law during closing argument are presumed cured by final Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1603-CR-541 | January 27, 2017 Page 11 of 12 instruction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunter, Givan, Debruler, Prentice, Pivarnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.