Hudgens v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court failed to establish sufficient facts to overcome presumption of vindictiveness where the same trial judge sentenced defendant in the original trial and on retrial
• modifying sentence and reinstating original punishment when no new facts overcame presumption of vindictiveness in trial court’s increased sentencing following reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jolly v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-06-24· cited 15×
• Winston v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-11-20· cited 13×
• McGill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1998-02-11· cited 11×
• Whiteside v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2013-04-25· cited 11×
• Butler v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-10-13· cited 8×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• Texas v. McCullough
  Supreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 534×
• Bolden v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-01-30· cited 62×
• Bangs v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-07-13· cited 60×
• Calnan v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-11-02· cited 52×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-06-17· cited 50×
• Roberts v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-04-01· cited 34×
• Marx v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-03-02· cited 30×
• Cook v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1981-11-09· cited 25×
• Patrick v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-05-16· cited 19×
• Marshall v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1979-03-12· cited 10×