Hudgens v. Baugh

Citations

• 225 F. 899
• 1915 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1327

Syllabus

<p>Judgment c^»446—Enpobcement—Bight to Enjoin.</p> <p>While enforcement of a judgment may be enjoined, whore the unsuccessful party has been prevented from fully presenting his case by the deception of his oxiponent, a judgment on a note given for the price of a horse, v hich proved worthless, will not, where plaintiff, who was assignee of the note, was unconnected with the fraud, be enjoined on account of newly discovered evidence that defendant’s agent fraudulently conspired with the sellers; the fraud not affecting the judgment, and the defense being one which could have been presented at trial, which did not occur until a number of years after the sale and execution of the note.</p> <p>TEd. Note.—For other cases, see Judgment, Cent. Dig. §§ 845-848; ■ Dec. Dig. <0=344(1]</p> <p><2^>ii,or other oases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER, in all Key-Numfcered Digests & Indexes</p>