Hudelson v. Delta International MacHinery Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to review a claim that the district court erred in an evidentiary ruling because the district court did not \unqualifiedly rule upon the admissibility of th[e] evidence\
• “[W]e primarily focus upon the process used by the trial judge in reaching his or her decision, not upon the result of that decision.”
• “[W]e primarily focus upon the process used by the trial judge in reaching his or her decision, not upon the result of that decision.”
• “trial judge may grant a new trial on that ground if, after making his or her own assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and weighing the evidence, the judge determines that the verdict is not in accord with the clear weight of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).