S.D. New York· 8/21/1998
Hudak v. Miller
Citations
- 28 F. Supp. 2d 827
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13114
- 1998 WL 542307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Evidence that the risk [to plaintiff] was obvious may suffice to allow a factfinder to infer actual knowledge from that obviousness.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sotomayor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court· 1986-03-04· cited 6,155×
- Huey B. Wright v. Harold Smith and Thomas A. Coughlin, IIISecond Circuit· 1994-04-06· cited 1,168×
- Schwapp v. Town of AvonSecond Circuit· 1997-07-02· cited 664×
- Hathaway v. CoughlinSecond Circuit· 1996-11-08· cited 319×
- Knight v. U.S. Fire InsuranceSecond Circuit· 1986-10-22· cited 219×
- Hemmings v. GorczykSecond Circuit· 1998-01-16· cited 40×
- Porky Products, Inc. v. Nippon Express U.S.A. (Illinois), Inc.S.D. New York· 1997-08-21· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.