Skip to main content
· 5/16/1990

Hudak v. Jepsen of Illinois, Inc.

Citations

  • 739 F. Supp. 1170
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6150
  • 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,220
  • 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 659
  • 1990 WL 96829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the fact Mr. Byrd relied on his own expertise to assess the cost and time required to implement the alternative, as opposed to retrieving data from Sony, does not render Mr. Byrd’s methodology unreliable”
  • “The Court 9 will not exclude an expert report based on Sony’s assumption which may be disproven at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aspen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.