· 5/16/1990
Hudak v. Jepsen of Illinois, Inc.
Citations
- 739 F. Supp. 1170
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6150
- 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,220
- 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 659
- 1990 WL 96829
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the fact Mr. Byrd relied on his own expertise to assess the cost and time required to implement the alternative, as opposed to retrieving data from Sony, does not render Mr. Byrd’s methodology unreliable”
- “The Court 9 will not exclude an expert report based on Sony’s assumption which may be disproven at trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aspen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.