Skip to main content
· 3/15/1999

Hucko v. City of Oak Forest

Citations

  • 185 F.R.D. 526
  • 52 Fed. R. Serv. 198
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3316
  • 1999 WL 250648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that pleading on information and belief in Rule9(b) context requires statement of efforts to obtain necessary information and what facts provide basis for allegations
  • dismissing the retaliation claim after finding the plaintiff’s “acts as alleged would constitute protected activity, but nowhere is it alleged that [the plaintiff] sought to conduct this activity to institute a FCA action and therefore, it was not protected activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schenkier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.