Hubscher Ribbon Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that use of petition rates is authorized by statute
• “Although courts are generally suspicious of petition rates, ... Congress has not foreclosed their use.”
• “In practice ‘corroboration’ involves confirming that secondary information has ‘probative value,’ by examining its ‘reliability and relevance.’ ” (citations omitted)
• “In practice ‘corroboration’ involves confirming that secondary information has ‘probative value,’ by examining its ‘reliability and relevance.’” (citations omitted)
• “[Corroboration is] a substantial evidence question in which the court reviews the reasonableness of Commerce's actions against a known legal standard given Court No. 22-00063 Page 26 the facts and circumstances of the administrative record.”
• “In practice ‘corroboration’ involves confirming that secondary information has ‘probative value,’ by examining its ‘reliability and relevance.’ ” (quoting 19 C.F.R. § 351.308(d); Mittal Steel Galati S.A. v. United States, 31 CIT 730, 734, 491 F.Supp.2d 1273, 1278 (2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).