Hubicki v. Festina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that default judgment cannot withstand direct attack by defendant who was not served in strict compliance with Texas Rules of Civil Procedure
• holding that alternative service was not adequate when Festina made a single attempt to serve Hubicki under rule 106(a) before moving for alternative service under rule 106(b
• stating that courts must “rigidly enforce rules governing service when a default judgment is rendered”
• holding that default judgment rendered on defective service cannot stand
• Appellee failed to establish return of service in absence of a return receipt with appellant's signature, \as Rule 107 contemplates when service is effected under Rule 106(a)(2).\
• service via regular mail held improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).