Hubert v. Auvray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiffs sufficiently alleged discriminatory animus when the complaint detailed, inter alia, verbal attacks and written materials threatening “eradication” and “violent suppression” of the plaintiffs’ religious group
• “the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, ‘protects the individual against state against, not against wrongs done by individuals . . . where a plaintiff seeks to enforce a right under § 1985(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).