Huber v. U.S. Parole Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Prior to the enactment of BAPCPA, projected disposable income was commonly determined from Schedule I and J. But this practice for above-median debtors has been superseded by §1325(b
• debtors who claimed deduction for an underwater second mortgage that they intended to strip off “failed to commit all their projected disposable income to their chapter 13 plan” and therefore plan would not be confirmed
• “Post-BAPCPA, a court may deviate from the amount reflected in a debtor’s [Form 122C-2] when calculating projected disposable income in ‘unusual cases’ where a debtor presents ‘known or virtually certain information about . . . future income or expenses.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).