Skip to main content
· 12/3/1992

Huber v. Danning (In Re Thomas)

Citations

  • 147 B.R. 526
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 16860
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10151
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 1943
  • 23 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1291
  • 1992 WL 372136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In this case, unlike Professional Investment Properties, the petition made no mention of [the alleged constructive trust interest] in the property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Volinn, Perris, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.