Hubbard v. Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellate court relied on trial testimony to determine what was depicted in photographs because appellate record had poor-quality photocopies
• photographs taken with different photographic equipment on different dates were relevant and material because the jury could use the photographs “as a basis for determining the severity of the victim’s injuries or the credibility of her version of events”
• photographs taken with different photographic equipment on different dates were relevant and material because the jury could use the photographs “as a basis for determining the severity of the victim’s injuries or the credibility of her version of events”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).