Skip to main content
· 1/28/1985

Hubbard v. Union Oil Co. of California

Citations

  • 601 F. Supp. 790
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding neither prejudice to plaintiff nor duplication of judicial time and effort qualified as grounds for remand because removal otherwise was proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.