Hubbard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court could not “reach the merits” of a Rule 37 petitioner’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim “because Hubbard has not included an abstract of the trial in his brief.”
• court could not \reach the merits\ of a Rule 37 petitioner's ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim \because Hubbard has not included an abstract of the trial in his brief.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Michael Clay v. Larry Norris
  Eighth Circuit· 2007-04-25· cited 9×
• George Jones v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2021-09-15

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Vickers v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-05-03· cited 46×
• Hubbard v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-06-24· cited 33×
• Pogue v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-03-21· cited 17×