Hubbard v. SOBRECK, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ADA preempts another California fee- shifting statute to the extent that it authorizes defendants to recover fees for defending against non-frivolous ADA claims
• federal disability law’s attorney’s fees provision preempts state law
• “We hold that to the extent that Section 55 does authorize the award of fees to a prevailing 6 defendant on nonfrivolous CDPA state claims that parallel nonfrivolous ADA claims, there is a 7 conflict and the ADA preempts Section 55 of the CDPA,” id. at 747

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).