Hubbard v. President, Directors of Hamilton Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Court refuses to address argument when appellants cite only to one statute and “no other authority and make no cogent argument”
• Court refuses to address argument when appellants cite only to one statute and “no other authority and make no cogent argument”
• “A restrictive covenant that runs with the land is one that ‘inures to the benefit of, or must be fulfilled by, whatever party holds the land at the time when fulfillment is due.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).