Hubbard v. Curtiss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that title automatically vests in the adverse possessor at the end of the statutory period if all the requirements are met
• finding that grantee purchaser was an adverse possessor where he took possession of one property, but inadvertently accepted a deed describing a second property
• finding that grantee purchaser was an adverse possessor where he took possession of one property, but inadvertently accepted a deed describing a second property
• discussing acknowledgment that grantee's title is not subordinate as element of hostility in grantor-grantee relationship
• discussing acknowledgment that grantee's title is not subordinate as element of hostility in grantor-grantee relationship
• “[T]itle automatically vests in the adverse possessor at the end of the statutory period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).