Hubbard v. CITY OF PIERRE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that special benefits must be “above and beyond or differing from the benefit enjoyed by the general public”
• noting that “[t]he circuit court was unable to conclude from the evidence that the replaced curb, gutter, and driveways provided ‘actual, physical, material and quantifiable special benefits’ to the property assessed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).