· 9/3/1974
Huard v. Forest Street Housing, Inc.
Citations
- 316 N.E.2d 505
- 366 Mass. 203
- 1974 Mass. LEXIS 710
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analogous provision of Statewide rent control act, St. 1970, c. 842, § 11 [a]
- stipulation that omitted “seemingly significant information” set aside and matter remanded to trial court
- “Even if the [board’s] determinations were invalid ab initio, it would seem that landlords who had obtained increases pursuant to improper criteria would have been entitled to redeterminations pursuant to proper standards”
- where an action was tried on a stipulation of facts which omitted ‘seemingly significant information’ known to the court because of earlier litigation, the stipulation was set aside and remanded to the trial court
- where an action was tried on a stipulation of facts which omitted “seemingly significant information” known to the court because of earlier litigation, the stipulation was set aside and the matter remanded to the trial court
- stipulation set aside because it omitted “seemingly significant information”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tauro, Reardon, Hennessey, Kaplan, Wilkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.