Skip to main content
· 9/3/1974

Huard v. Forest Street Housing, Inc.

Citations

  • 316 N.E.2d 505
  • 366 Mass. 203
  • 1974 Mass. LEXIS 710

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analogous provision of Statewide rent control act, St. 1970, c. 842, § 11 [a]
  • stipulation that omitted “seemingly significant information” set aside and matter remanded to trial court
  • “Even if the [board’s] determinations were invalid ab initio, it would seem that landlords who had obtained increases pursuant to improper criteria would have been entitled to redeterminations pursuant to proper standards”
  • where an action was tried on a stipulation of facts which omitted ‘seemingly significant information’ known to the court because of earlier litigation, the stipulation was set aside and remanded to the trial court
  • where an action was tried on a stipulation of facts which omitted “seemingly significant information” known to the court because of earlier litigation, the stipulation was set aside and the matter remanded to the trial court
  • stipulation set aside because it omitted “seemingly significant information”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro, Reardon, Hennessey, Kaplan, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.