Huang v. Shiu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding predominance requirement not satisfied in suit seeking benefits for treatment of bipolar disorder because of the need for individualized inquiries on the accuracy of the diagnoses, noncoverage, and estoppel
• “[T]he primary limitation on the use of Rule 23(b)(2) is the requirement that injunctive or declaratory relief be the predominant remedy requested for the class members.”
• mutual interest in resolving common questions must be greater than individual interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).