Huang v. Murray
Syllabus
The named defendant, M, appealed from the trial court's judgment of pos- session for the plaintiff landlord in the plaintiff's summary process action. M claimed, inter alia, that the court had misapplied the law in rendering the judgment of possession. Held: M failed to demonstrate that the trial court's legal conclusion regarding his right to occupy the premises was not legally and logically correct or that the relevant facts that the court had relied on were not supported by the evidence in the record, and, accordingly, this court affirmed the judgment of possession rendered against M. This court dismissed the appeal with respect to M's claims regarding the trial court's rulings against the other defendants because it concluded that M was not aggrieved relative to those claims, and, therefore, the claims were jurisdictionally defective, and this court could not adjudicate their merits. Argued January 22—officially released February 24, 2026
Judges: Suarez; Westbrook; Wilson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.