Huang v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Heck was inapplicable where plaintiff “ha[d] no habeas remedy because he has long since been released from . . . custody”
• relying on “our holding in Leather” where plaintiff challenged length of custody, not validity of conviction
• “The Eleventh Amendment bars a suit against a state in federal court unless that state has consented to the litigation or Congress has permissibly enacted legislation specifically overriding the state’s immunity.” (citation omitted)
• applying Meachum to analyze “restrictive” juvenile day placement program

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).