· 10/7/2013
Hua v. United States
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 168
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 115
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3183
- 571 U.S. 866
- 2013 WL 2903737
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7179
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting identical argument because claimant “cites no authority–and we have found none–that requires an ALJ to use the same RFC that a different ALJ used in denying benefits for a prior period”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.