Skip to main content
· 7/10/2003

Hsien I. Peng v. Mei Chin Penghu Jonathan Hu S. Gage, Los Angeles County Deputy, Badge No. 406857, Sued Individually

Citations

  • 335 F.3d 970
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 7607
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6033
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13837
  • 2003 WL 21544163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a sufficiently detailed victim statement alone sufficed to establish probable cause for the arrest
  • holding that inconsistencies in an officer’s testimony and police report “do not establish that [the officer] fabricated evidence”
  • concluding that even probable cause may exist on the basis of a tip or information that turns out to be false
  • holding that dismissal of the appeal was inappropriate where appellant failed to attach to his notice of appeal the district court’s order granting defendant qualified immunity
  • explaining that probable 15 cause may be established by a victim’s statements that provide “facts sufficiently detailed to cause 16 a reasonable person to believe a crime had been committed and the named suspect was the 17 perpetrator”
  • affirming summary judgment against plaintiff and rejecting argument that arresting officer’s reliance on translated witness statements was improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Graber, Singleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.