Skip to main content
· 10/5/2006

HSBC Bank USA v. UAL Corp. (In Re UAL Corp.)

Citations

  • 351 B.R. 916
  • 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2498
  • 47 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 73
  • 2006 WL 2848609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that location is an “essential attribute of real estate,” that a proper comparable “should provide all of the locational advantages of the subject property” and that Rash suggests that “like property should be as much like the collateral as possible”
  • noting that Rash “dealt with fungible property” and that “[w]ith this sort of fungibility, valuing ‘like property’ is a relatively straightforward fact-finding endeavor” in contrast to non-fungible property, where there is not a readily accessible market price
  • “Upon surrender under Pre-BAPC-PA § 1325(a)(5)(C), liquidation value was clearly the yardstick by which the allowed secured claim was determined, while, for cramdown purposes under Pre-BAPCPA § 1325(a)(5)(B
  • replacement value should depend on the nature of the property and the markets available to the particular debtor; because the property at issue was not fungible, a generic wholesale valuation was inappropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eugene R. Wedoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.