H.S.B.C. Bank U.S.A., N.A. v. Isaacson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that judge’s absence during closing arguments was harmless because nothing irregular happened and government’s case against defendant was “strong”
• “ ‘Appointing an expert is within the discretion of the [c]ourt,’ therefore, we review the denial of a CJA funding request for an abuse of discretion.” (alteration in original) (citation omitted
• stating structural errors are subject to automatic reversal
• stating structural errors are subject to automatic reversal
• describing and ruling upon the relevant events
• “[T]he government’s case was strong.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).