HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Castro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an attorney was in violation of Rule 19-301.5 due to his failure to provide the legal services outlined in his retainer agreement and where the majority of the work for his client was completed by a non-lawyer
• lawyer violated 5.4(a) by forming consulting arrangement with capital firm wherein clients would sign law firm retainer, capital firm would handle the loan modification and the firms would split the fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).