Hrnjak v. Graymar, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of collateral source benefits is admissible where the evidence carries \substantial probative value as proof that the plaintiff is a malingerer.\
• “collateral source rule” applied absent a court finding, outside of the presence of the jury, that there is a strong inference of malingering
• “The potentially prejudicial impact of evidence that a personal injury plaintiff received collateral insurance payments varies little from case to case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).